SHAMBALALABABBABUSKITWIZKALUMBA -Speaking in Tongues

SHAMBALALABABBABUSKITWIZKALUMBA -Speaking in Tongues

Breaking local prophet stands up and declares at local charismatic  assembly:

“I have the gift of interpretation and you just said in tongues-that you are a false teacher!”

1. NOT EVERY BELIEVER EVER SPOKE IN TONGUES

Modern “Tongue” speakers claim:
“Tongues are for every believer. If you do not speak in tongues you are not a real Christian!”
Scripture says the opposite.

Paul asks rhetorical questions expecting a ‘NO’ answer:

“Do all speak with tongues?”
—1 Corinthians 12:30

In Greek, the structure (μὴ πάντες…?) indicates the expected answer is NO.

Paul lists spiritual gifts as diverse and distributed differently:

“The Spirit divides to each one individually as He wills.”
—1 Cor. 12:11

Tongues were never for all Christians.

If tongues were for everyone, Paul would not have:

  • said not all speak in tongues

  • compared tongues to lesser gifts (1 Cor. 12:28)

  • ranked tongues near the bottom of the list

  • rebuked the Corinthian obsession with tongues

New Testament pattern

  • Acts 2 – only apostles spoke

  • Acts 8 – no tongues mentioned for the Samaritans

  • Acts 9 – Paul converted, no tongues

  • Acts 16 – Lydia converted, no tongues

  • Acts 17 – Athenians converted, no tongues

  • Acts 18 – Corinthians converted, no tongues recorded

  • Acts 19 – unique outpouring tied to apostolic confirmation

Tongues appeared only in special transitional moments, never as a universal sign.

 

2. TONGUES MUST ALWAYS BE INTERPRETED OR REMAIN SILENT

Paul gives non-negotiable commands for tongues in the assembly.

If no interpreter → NO TONGUES.

“If there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church.”
—1 Cor. 14:28

This is not optional. It is a command.

Tongues must be:

  1. Two or at most three (v. 27)

  2. In order, one at a time

  3. Always interpreted

  4. Judged by the prophets (v. 29)

Anything else is forbidden.

Modern tongues violate EVERY command:

  • Dozens speaking at once

  • No interpretation

  • Out of order

  • Women often leading (contrary to v. 34–35)

  • Emotional chaos

  • No judgment or testing

Paul warned that uncontrolled tongues make the church look crazy:

“Will they not say that you are mad?”
—1 Cor. 14:23

This is exactly what modern charismatic services look like.

 

3. BIBLICAL TONGUES HAD A SPECIFIC PURPOSE THAT HAS ENDED

Purpose #1 — A sign of judgment on Israel

Paul quotes Isaiah 28:11–12:

“With men of other tongues… will I speak to this people.”
—1 Cor. 14:21

This refers to God using foreign languages (Assyrian) to judge Israel.

Paul concludes:

“Tongues are a sign… for unbelieving Israel.”
—1 Cor. 14:22

Tongues were never for:

  • spiritual prayer languages

  • private edification

  • ecstatic experiences

  • evidence of salvation

Tongues were a sign to the Jews that judgment had come and the new covenant was arriving.

Once Jerusalem fell in AD 70, the sign was fulfilled, and the gift ceased.

 

Purpose #2 — To authenticate the apostles’ message

Hebrews says:

God bore witness… through signs, wonders, and various miracles given to the apostles.
—Heb. 2:3–4

Paul calls tongues signs of an apostle:

“Truly the signs of an APOSTLE were wrought among you…”
—2 Cor. 12:12

Tongues were apostolic credentials, not a common church practice.

Once the apostles died and the Scripture was complete, the gift had no remaining purpose.

 

4. Biblical Tongues Were Real Languages — and Sometimes Heavenly

I do believe that, at times, tongues were a heavenly language—the “tongues of angels.” But they were also real human languages—languages unknown to the speaker, spoken miraculously so that others could understand.

Acts 2 illustrates this clearly:

“We hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.” —Acts 2:11

These were real languages, not gibberish, yet unknown to the speaker. The Greek word glōssai can refer to both human languages and heavenly tongues.

Modern tongues, however:

Are never actual foreign languages

Have no grammar or syntax

Consist of repetitive syllables

Are identical across denominations and religions

If the gift of tongues today were real, believers could speak languages unknown to them, but this never happens. The absence of true foreign languages demonstrates that modern tongues are not the biblical gift—they are counterfeit.

5. TONGUES HAVE CEASED – AND SCRIPTURE SAYS THEY WOULD

“Whether there be tongues, they shall cease.”
—1 Cor. 13:8

The word “cease” (παύσονται) means:

  • to stop on their own

  • to die out naturally

  • to come to an end permanently

Tongues were temporary, tied to:

  • the apostolic era

  • the foundation of the ekklesia (Eph. 2:20)

  • the completion of revelation

Once the foundation is laid, you don’t keep laying it.

 

6. HISTORICAL FACT: TONGUES DISAPPEARED FOR 1,800 YEARS

The early church fathers unanimously attest:

  • tongues vanished after the apostles

  • the gift was not in their churches

  • it was not practiced by Christians

Tongues did not reappear until:

  • early 1900s

  • Azusa Street

  • emotionalism

  • doctrinal chaos

  • women preachers

  • holiness movement influences

What reappeared was NOT the biblical gift, but ecstatic pagan-style speech.

 

7. THE MODERN PRACTICE IS FAKE AND UNBIBLICAL

Modern tongues violate:

  • proper purpose

  • apostolic rules

  • biblical definition

  • biblical limitations

  • historical record

  • theological coherence

Modern “tongues” are:

  • emotionalism

  • peer pressure

  • learned behavior

  • hypnotic suggestion

  • subconscious imitation

  • manipulation from leaders

  • cultural conditioning

Not one single charismatic practice resembles the actual New Testament phenomenon.

 

 

Next
Next

Expository on James Part 1